Financial impact of donation after circulatory death heart transplantation: A single-center analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Clinical success of donation after circulatory death (DCD) heart transplantation is leading to growing adoption of this technique. In comparison to procurement from a brain-dead donor, DCD requires additional resources. The economic impact of DCD heart transplantation from the hospital perspective is not well known. METHODS: We compared the financial data of patients who received DCD allografts to those who received a DBD organ at our institution from January 1, 2021 to December 31, 2022. We also compared the cost of ex-situ machine perfusion to in-situ organ perfusion employed during DCD recovery. RESULTS: We performed 58 DBD and 22 DCD heart-alone transplantations during the study period. Out of 22 DCD grafts, 16 were recovered with thoracoabdominal normothermic regional perfusion (TA-NRP) and six with direct procurement followed by normothermic machine perfusion (DP-NMP). The contribution margin per case for DBD versus DCD was $234,362 and $235,440 (P = .72). The direct costs did not significantly differ between the two groups ($171,949 and 186,250; P = .49). In comparing the two methods of procuring hearts from DCD donors, the direct cost of TA-NRP was $155,955 in comparison to $223,399 for DP-NMP (P = .21). This difference translated into a clinically meaningful but not statistically significant greater contribution margin for TA-NRP ($242, 657 vs. $175,768; P = .34). CONCLUSIONS: Our data showed that the adoption of DCD procurement did not have a negative financial impact on the contribution margin in our institution. Programs considering starting DCD heart transplantation, and those who are currently performing DCD procurement should evaluate their own financial situation.

Utilization of Paragonix Sherpapak Cardiac Transport System for the Preservation of Donor Hearts After Circulatory Death.

BACKGROUND: Donation after circulatory death (DCD) heart transplantation is being increasingly adopted by transplant centers. The optimal method of DCD heart preservation during transport after in situ thoracoabdominal normothermic regional perfusion (TA-NRP) is not known. METHODS: We evaluated our experience with the Paragonix SherpaPak Cardiac Transport System (SCTS) for the transport of DCD cardiac allografts after TA-NRP recovery between January 2021 and December 2022. We collected and evaluated donor characteristics, allograft ischemic intervals, and recipient baseline demographic and clinical variables, and short-term outcomes. RESULTS: Twelve recipients received DCD grafts recovered with TA-NRP and transported in SCTS during the study period. The median age of 10 male and 2 female donors was 32 years (min 15, max 38). The median duration of functional warm ischemia was 12 minutes (min 8, max 22). Hearts were preserved in SCTS for a median of 158 minutes (min 37, max 224). Median recipient age was 61 years (min 28, max 70). Ten recipients (83%) survived to hospital discharge, with one death attributable to graft dysfunction (8%). The median vasoactive-inotropic (VIS) score at 72 hours post-transplantation of the entire cohort was 6 (min 0, max 15). The median length of intensive care unit stay in hospital survivors was 5 days (min 3, max 17) days and hospital stay 17 days (min 9, max 37). CONCLUSIONS: The Paragonix SCTS provides efficacious preservation of DCD grafts for ≥3.5 hours. Organs transported with this device showed satisfactory post-transplantation function.

Does Tracheostomy Improve Outcomes in Those Receiving Venovenous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation?

Patients receiving venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO) often require extended periods of ventilation. We examined the role of tracheostomy on outcomes of patients supported with VV-ECMO. We reviewed all patients at our institution who received VV-ECMO between 2013 and 2019. Patients who received a tracheostomy were compared with VV-ECMO-supported patients without tracheostomy. The primary outcome measure was survival to hospital discharge. Secondary outcome measures included length of intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital stay and adverse events related to the tracheostomy procedure. Multivariable analysis was performed to identify predictors of in-hospital mortality. We dichotomized patients receiving tracheostomy into an "early" and "late" group based on median days to tracheostomy following ECMO cannulation and separate analysis was performed. One hundred and fifty patients met inclusion criteria, 32 received a tracheostomy. Survival to discharge was comparable between the groups (53.1% vs. 57.5%, p = 0.658). Predictors of mortality on multivariable analysis included Respiratory ECMO Survival Prediction (RESP) score (odds ratio [OR] = 0.831, p = .015) and blood urea nitrogen (BUN) (OR = 1.026, p = 0.011). Tracheostomy performance was not predictive of mortality (OR = 0.837, p = 0.658). Bleeding requiring intervention occurred in 18.7% of patients following tracheostomy. Early tracheostomy (<7 days from the initiation of VV-ECMO) was associated with shorter ICU (25 vs. 36 days, p = 0.04) and hospital (33 vs. 47, p = 0.017) length of stay compared with late tracheostomy. We conclude that tracheostomy can be performed safely in patients receiving VV-ECMO. Mortality in these patients is predicted by severity of the underlying disease. Performance of tracheostomy does not impact survival. Early tracheostomy may decrease length of stay.

Impact of donation after circulatory death heart transplantation on waitlist outcomes and transplantation activity.

INTRODUCTION: Donation after circulatory death (DCD) heart transplantation has been shown to have comparable outcomes to transplantation using brain death donors (DBDs). This study evaluates the impact of this alternative source of allografts on waitlist mortality and transplant volume. METHODS: We compared waitlist mortality and transplant rates in patients who were registered before (2019 period) and after we adopted DCD heart transplantation (2021 period). RESULTS: We identified 111 patients who were on the waiting list in 2019 and 77 patients who were registered during 2021. Total number of donor organ offers received in 2019 was 385 (178 unique donors) versus 3450 (1145 unique donors) in 2021. More than 40% of all donors in 2021 were DCDs. Waitlist mortality was comparable for patients in 2019 and 2021 (18/100 person-years in 2019 vs. 26/100 person-years in 2021, p = .49). The transplant rate was 67/100 person-years in 2019 versus 207/100 person-years in 2021 (p < .001). After adjusting for acuity status, gender, blood type, and weight, patients listed in 2021 had 2.08 times greater chance of transplantation compared to patients listed in 2019 (HR 2.08, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.26-3.45, p = .004). CONCLUSIONS: Use of DCD donor hearts significantly increased heart transplant rate in our institution.

Cardiac function unchanged following reanimation with normothermic regional perfusion in donation after circulatory death.

Objectives: To determine whether hearts reanimated with normothermic regional perfusion (NRP) have clinically detectable changes in function using echocardiography comparing the prearrest and post-NRP imaging. As heart transplantation from donation after circulatory death (DCD) continues to increase, preliminary results suggest outcomes comparable with donation after brain death. It is unknown whether the obligatory period of warm ischemia experienced during DCD withdrawal process causes immediate changes in cardiac allograft function following in situ reanimation. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed and compared predonation with postreanimation echocardiographic findings in all DCD donors at our institution from January to October 2021. All DCD donor organs were reanimated with in situ thoracoabdominal NRP after circulatory death. Echocardiographic assessment included (1) 2-dimensional and speckle-tracking measures of chamber size and function; (2) ejection fraction; (3) fractional area change; and (4) global longitudinal strain. Results: Altogether, 4 DCD heart donations were performed during the study period. Basic demographics and withdrawal ischemic time periods are reported. There were no changes in left ventricular ejection fraction and right ventricular fractional area change when comparing the predonation and the postreanimation echocardiogram. There was a minimal, nonstatistically significant decrease in left ventricular global longitudinal strain and right ventricular free-wall systolic strain in 3 of the 4 donors following reanimation. Conclusions: DCD cardiac allografts reanimated with NRP demonstrated no change in echocardiographic parameters used for a standard predonation donor heart evaluation. Findings suggest cardiac function of DCD allografts reanimated with thoracoabdominal NRP is not adversely impacted by limited period of warm ischemia following circulatory arrest.

In a large-volume multidisciplinary setting individual surgeon volume does not impact LVAD outcomes.

BACKGROUND: In complex operations surgeon volume may impact outcomes. We sought to understand if individual surgeon volume affects left ventricular assist device (LVAD) outcomes. METHODS: We reviewed primary LVAD implants at an experienced ventricular assist devices (VAD)/transplant center between 2013 and 2019. Cases were dichotomized into a high-volume group (surgeons averaging 11 or more LVAD cases per year), and a low-volume group (10 or less per year). Propensity score matching was performed. Survival to discharge, 1-year survival, and incidence of major adverse events were compared between the low- and high-volume groups. Predictors of survival were identified with multivariate analysis. RESULTS: There were 315 patients who met inclusion criteria-45 in the low-volume group, 270 in the high-volume group. There was no difference in survival to hospital discharge between the low (91.9%) and high (83.3%) volume matched groups (p = .22). Survival at 1-year was also similar (85.4% vs. 80.6%, p = .55). There was no difference in the incidence of major adverse events between the groups. Predictors of mortality in the first year included: age (hazards ratio [HR]: 1.061, p < .001), prior sternotomy (HR: 1.991, p = .01), increasing international normalized ratio (HR: 4.748, p < .001), increasing AST (HR: 1.001, p < .001), increasing bilirubin (HR: 1.081, p = .01), and preoperative mechanical ventilation (HR: 2.662, p = .005). Individual surgeon volume was not an independent predictor of discharge or 1-year survival. CONCLUSION: There was no difference in survival or adverse events between high and low volume surgeons suggesting that, in an experienced multidisciplinary setting, low-volume VAD surgeons can achieve similar outcomes to their high-volume colleagues.

Thoracoabdominal Normothermic Perfusion in Donation After Circulatory Death.

Donation after circulatory death is emerging as an alternative pathway to donation after brain death to expand the cardiac organ donor pool. We describe the surgical technique and circuit configuration for in-situ organ reperfusion with thoracoabdominal normothermic regional perfusion using portable venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

Successful lung transplantation with graft recovered after thoracoabdominal normothermic perfusion from donor after circulatory death.

Lung transplantation with lungs procured from donors after circulatory death (DCD) has been established as an alternative technique to traditional donation after brain death (DBD) with comparable outcomes. Recently, in situ thoracoabdominal normothermic regional perfusion (TA-NRP) has emerged as a novel technique employed in the procurement of cardiac allografts after circulatory death. TA-NRP, in contrast to ex situ machine perfusion, has the advantage of allowing in situ assessment of donor organs prior to final acceptance. However, there are some concerns that this technique may adversely impact the quality of lung allografts. Here, we present a case of a successful bilateral sequential lung transplantation in a patient with postinflammatory pulmonary fibrosis due to acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), with lungs procured after normothermic in situ lung perfusion. Apart from the lungs, heart, liver, and kidneys were also successfully transplanted from this donor.

Left Ventricular Assist Device Outflow Cannula Obstruction: Importance of Multimodality Imaging.

One of the dreaded complications of left ventricular assist device implantation is mechanical obstruction of the device secondary to pump thrombosis or mechanical outflow cannula obstruction. We describe a case of outflow cannula obstruction caused by kinking and twisting of the outflow graft after surgical manipulation of the pump. (Level of Difficulty: Beginner.).

Can we expect improvements in outcomes with centrifugal vs axial flow left ventricular assist devices in patients transitioned from extracorporeal life support?

BACKGROUND: Several patient-related characteristics have been associated with inferior outcomes following durable left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation in patients transitioned from venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA ECMO). The impact of LVAD pump type used is less well-known. METHODS: We compared outcomes between patents who received axial and centrifugal flow LVADs following stabilization with VA ECMO. RESULTS: From January 2011 to December 2018, we implanted 28 LVADs in patients transitioned from VA ECMO. This included 17 axial flow devices (HeartMate II LVAD, Abbott Laboratories, Chicago, IL) and 11 centrifugal flow pumps (eight HeartWare HVADs; Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN and three HeartMate 3 LVAS pumps; Abbott Laboratories, Chicago, IL). There was no difference in hospital mortality (23.5% vs 18.2%, P = .74) or 1-year survival (P = .31) between the devices. There were no differences in adverse event rates between the two pump types, apart from a higher rate of gastrointestinal bleeding in patients who received centrifugal flow pumps (1.44 events per 100 patient-months vs 14.67 events per 100 patient-months, P = .010). Preimplantation levels of alanine aminotransferase (hazard ratio [HR], 1.001; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.000 to 1.002; P = .004) and elevated serum creatinine level (HR, 3.480; 95% CI, 1.121-10.807; P = .031) emerged as significant predictors of decreased 1-year survival. CONCLUSIONS: Preimplantation optimization of end-organ function is the single most important determinant of successful post-LVAD survival in patients transitioned from extracorporeal life support. There is no association of pump type with LVAD outcomes up to 1-year post implantation.

Subtotal cholecystectomy for the hostile gallbladder: failure to control the cystic duct results in significant morbidity.

BACKGROUND: Outcomes following the inability to control the cystic duct due to a hostile triangle of Calot during cholecystectomy remain unknown. The purpose of this study was to analyze the safety and efficacy of subtotal cholecystectomy, with attention to the necessity for secondary interventions. METHODS: Sixteen thousand five hundred ninety six cholecystectomies from January 2002 to August 2014 were reviewed, identifying patients managed with subtotal cholecystectomy, defined as the inability to isolate/transect the cystic duct. After propensity matching, we investigated surgical indications, perioperative outcomes, and the necessity for secondary ERCP, percutaneous drainage, and completion cholecystectomy. RESULTS: 65 (0.39%) patients underwent subtotal cholecystectomy; 54 (83.1%) began laparoscopically, of which 30 (55.6%) required conversion to laparotomy. Subtotal cholecystectomy, performed more frequently for acute cholecystitis (70.8% vs 34.6%), was associated with extended hospitalizations (4 d vs 2 d) and frequent surgical site infections (20% vs 4.6%). 25 (38.5%) subtotal cholecystectomy patients required ≥1 secondary intervention, and compared to standard cholecystectomy, underwent higher rates postoperative ERCP (30.8% vs 5.4%), percutaneous drainage (9.2% vs 1.5%), and completion cholecystectomy (6.2% vs 0%) [all P < 0.05]. DISCUSSION: Subtotal cholecystectomy fails to control the cystic duct, resulting in significant morbidity. Most do not require completion cholecystectomy; however, patients demand close observation and, frequently, secondary interventions.

Long-term survival following kidney transplantation in previous lung transplant recipients-An analysis of the unos registry.

BACKGROUND: Kidney transplantation has been advocated as a therapeutic option in lung recipients who develop end-stage renal disease (ESRD). This analysis outlines patterns of allograft survival following kidney transplantation in previous lung recipients (KAL). METHODS: Data from the UNOS lung and kidney transplantation registries (1987-2013) were cross-linked to identify lung recipients who were subsequently listed for and/or underwent kidney transplantation. Time-dependent Cox models compared the survival rates in KAL patients with those waitlisted for renal transplantation who never received kidneys. Survival analyses compared outcomes between KAL patients and risk-matched recipients of primary, kidney-only transplantation with no history of lung transplantation (KTx). RESULTS: A total of 270 lung recipients subsequently underwent kidney transplantation (KAL). Regression models demonstrated a lower risk of post-listing mortality for KAL patients compared with 346 lung recipients on the kidney waitlist who never received kidneys (P<.05). Comparisons between matched KAL and KTx patients demonstrated significantly increased risk of death and graft loss (P<.05), but not death-censored graft loss, for KAL patients (P = .86). CONCLUSIONS: KAL patients enjoy a significant survival benefit compared with waitlisted lung recipients who do not receive kidneys. However, KAL patients do poorly compared with KTx patients. Decisions about KAL transplantation must be made on a case-by-case basis considering patient and donor factors.

Clinical predictors and outcome implications of early readmission in lung transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to identify risk factors and outcome implications for 30-day hospital readmission in lung transplant recipients. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of lung transplant cases from a single, high-volume lung transplant program between January 2000 and March 2012. Demographic and health data were reviewed for all patients. Risk factors for 30-day readmission (defined as readmission within 30 days of discharge from index lung transplant hospitalization) were modeled using logistic regression, with selection of parameters by backward elimination. RESULTS: The sample comprised 795 patients after excluding scheduled readmissions and in-hospital deaths. Overall 30-day readmission rate was 45.4% (n = 361). Readmission rates were similar across different diagnosis categories and procedure types. By univariate analysis, post-operative complications that predisposed to 30-day readmission included pneumonia, any infection, and atrial fibrillation (all p < 0.05). In the final multivariate model, occurrence of any post-transplant complication was the most significant risk factor for 30-day readmission (odds ratio = 1.764; 95% confidence interval, 1.259-2.470). Even for patients with no documented perioperative complication, readmission rates were still >35%. Kaplan-Meier analysis and multi-variate regression modeling to assess readmission as a predictor of long-term outcomes showed that 30-day readmission was not a significant predictor of worse survival in lung recipients. CONCLUSIONS: Occurrence of at least 1 post-transplant complication increases risk for 30-day readmission in lung transplant recipients. In this patient population, 30-day readmission does not predispose to adverse long-term survival. Quality indicators other than 30-day readmission may be needed to assess hospitals that perform lung transplantation.

Medication Nonadherence After Lung Transplantation in Adult Recipients.

BACKGROUND: Our objective was to identify potential avenues for resource allocation and patient advocacy to improve outcomes by evaluating the association between recipient sociodemographic and patient characteristics and medication nonadherence after lung transplantation. METHODS: States US adult, lung-only transplantations per the United Network for Organ Sharing database were analyzed from October 1996 through December 2006, based on the period during which nonadherence information was recorded. Generalized linear models were used to determine the association of demographic, disease, and transplantation center characteristics with early nonadherence (defined as within the first year after transplantation) as well as late nonadherence (years 2 to 4 after transplantation). Outcomes comparing adherent and nonadherent patients were also evaluated. RESULTS: Patients (n = 7,284) were included for analysis. Early and late nonadherence rates were 3.1% and 10.6%, respectively. Factors associated with early nonadherence were Medicaid insurance compared with private insurance (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 2.45, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.16 to 5.15), and black race (AOR 2.38, 95% CI: 1.08 to 5.25). Medicaid insurance and black race were also associated with late nonadherence (AOR 2.38, 95% CI: 1.51 to 3.73 and OR 1.73, 95% CI: 1.04 to 2.89, respectively), as were age 18 to 20 years (AOR 3.41, 95% CI: 1.29 to 8.99) and grade school or lower education (AOR 1.88, 95% CI: 1.05 to 3.35). Early and late nonadherence were both associated with significantly shorter unadjusted survival (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Identifying patients at risk of nonadherence may enable resource allocation and patient advocacy to improve outcomes.

Assessing Consequences of Intraaortic Balloon Counterpulsation Versus Left Ventricular Assist Devices at the Time of Heart Transplantation.

The proportion of heart transplant recipients bridged with durable, intracorporeal left ventricular assist devices (dLVADs) has dramatically increased; however, concern exists regarding obligate repeat sternotomy, increased bleeding risk because of anticoagulation and acquired von Willebrand disease, and increased rates of allosensitization. Whether dLVAD patients have impaired posttransplant outcomes compared with equivalent patients with less invasive intraaortic balloon pump counterpulsation (IABP) at the time of transplant is unknown. Therefore, we analyzed adult, first time, heart-only transplant procedures with dLVAD (n = 2,636) compared with IABP (n = 571) at the time of transplant based on data from the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) July 2004 to December 2011. There was clear geographic variation in IABP and dLVAD at transplant. Multivariable analysis demonstrated equivalent cumulative risk of death (adjusted Cox proportional hazard ratio, 1.08; 95% confidence interval, 0.87-1.33; p = 0.51). There was no significant difference in adjusted comparison of perioperative morality, length of stay, postoperative renal failure requiring dialysis, or early acute rejection (p ≥ 0.14 for all). Therefore, data from UNOS suggest that the presence of dLVAD at the time of heart transplantation does not have a detrimental effect on postoperative outcomes compared with IABP, which must be considered in the context of pretransplant mortality and locoregional organ availability.